South Korea’s top financial regulator has said developing North Korea’s economy in the case of eventual reunification would cost about 0bn (£320bn).
Shin Je-Yoon, chairman of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), told a seminar in Seoul that the estimate covered a period of 20 years that would be needed to raise the North’s per capita GDP from tpf=board/list&board_code=11,251 to ,000.
The FSC stressed the 0bn figure was open to revision and should not be taken as an official government position, but rather a starting point for discussion.
A survey released by the unification ministry this year showed that while 70% of South Koreans supported the idea of a unified peninsula, almost half showed no interest in helping cover the massive financial cost.
The FSC estimate noted that the South’s GDP was more than 40 times greater than the North’s in 2013, compared with the near tenfold difference between West Germany and East Germany at the time of their reunification in 1990.
Shin said half the needed funds could be bankrolled by public finance institutions in the South, such as the Korea Development Bank and Korea Exim Bank.
The other half could be financed by commercial banks, tax revenues from development projects in North Korea and international organisations such as the World Bank, he said.
Forecasting the cost of unification is an almost meaningless task, given the number of possible scenarios under which a merger might occur. As a result, estimates vary wildly, with the only real consensus being that it would be far from cheap.
Last year, South Korea’s finance ministry put the cost at about 7% of South Korea’s annual GDP for a decade.
That would mean about bn a year for 10 years – and that is assuming a peaceful unification scenario, which is by no means assured.
President Park Geun-hye has said reunification would bring a bonanza through the marriage of the South’s capital and technology with the North’s human and natural resources.
North Korea reacted angrily, accusing the South of dreaming “a pipe-dream” of reunification through absorption.
Because the 1950-53 Korean conflict ended with a ceasefire, the two Koreas remain technically at war. Cross-border tensions remain high and there have been minor skirmishes involving exchanges of fire along the land and sea borders in recent months.
www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/19/south-korea-cost-unification-500bn